I suggest you ...

Rank search results, not by distance from my route, but by how long the trip would be to that spot and then to my destination.

If I search for a "Starbucks" then the results are ranked by how far they are from my route. However, once I go to Starbucks I am not going to retrace my steps to get back on my original route, I am going to re-plot the fastest way to my destination. Thus, the cost of this search result was not 2x Distance from route, but (Distance traveled without going to Starbucks) - (Distance Traveled To Starbucks + Distance from Starbucks to destination)

1 vote
Vote
Sign in
(thinking…)
Password icon
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
Jim Hamilton shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

0 comments

Sign in
(thinking…)
Password icon
Signed in as (Sign out)
Submitting...

Feedback and Knowledge Base